Skip to main content

Featured

Iran–U.S. Gulf Strikes Escalate: What It Means for Your Canadian Wallet

  The Persian Gulf is on edge again — and this time, the ripple effects are showing up at Canadian gas pumps and grocery stores. On Wednesday, June 3, Iranian drones struck Kuwait's main airport, temporarily shutting it down and killing one person. The U.S. military struck back, targeting an Iranian military ground control station on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz. It is the latest in a series of back-and-forth military exchanges that are pushing a fragile ceasefire to the breaking point. What Is Happening Right Now? Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard confirmed it targeted U.S. military facilities — including the headquarters of the Navy's 5th Fleet in Bahrain — in retaliation for American strikes on Iranian territory. The U.S. responded with strikes on Qeshm Island. Meanwhile, semiofficial Iranian news agencies reported that Tehran has halted communications with ceasefire mediators, saying it wants the fighting in Lebanon resolved before any broader truce can be...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Canadian Manufacturers of COVID-19 Protective Equipment Sue Ottawa for $5 Billion in Damages

 

Canadian manufacturers who produce masks and other protective equipment to combat COVID-19 are pursuing legal action against the federal government, seeking more than $5 billion in damages. Their claim alleges that Ottawa misled them regarding the purchase and promotion of their products.

In a statement of claim filed in Federal Court, the companies and their industry association assert that the government made “negligent misrepresentations” that led them to invest in personal protective equipment innovations, manufacturing, and production. These misrepresentations spanned a three-year period starting in March 2020. The companies and the Canadian Association of PPE Manufacturers contend that the government provided misleading information about markets, direct assistance, flexible procurement, and long-term support.

The Canadian government had communicated through an initiative called Canada’s Plan to Mobilize Industry to fight COVID-19 that there would be new measures to directly support businesses in rapidly scaling up production or retooling their manufacturing lines. However, despite identifying masks and respirators as vital items for an airborne pandemic, the government did not contract with the Canadian companies, invoking a national security exception for procurement. Furthermore, in June 2021, the government allegedly promised a 10-year contract with the industry association and businesses to compensate for not purchasing protective equipment from domestic firms.

The companies claim that these misrepresentations resulted in approximately $88 million in investment losses and a further $5.4 billion in projected lost market opportunities over a ten-year period. They emphasize that this promise came from the highest levels of the Canadian government and was propagated across all relevant departments.

As the court case proceeds, the federal government will have an opportunity to respond to these unproven allegations. The manufacturers’ “special relationship” with the government, born out of a duty of care to small- and medium-sized businesses, underscores the significance of this legal battle.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment