Skip to main content

Featured

CUSMA Wasn’t Renewed: The 10-Year Clock Now Running on Your Job, Prices and Savings

  Canadian Money Brief | Feature CUSMA Wasn't Renewed: The 10-Year Clock Now Running on Your Job, Prices and Savings By MoneySavings.ca | Published November 2, 2026 Quick quiz: is Canada's free trade deal with the United States still in place? The honest answer is yes and no. The agreement known here as CUSMA is still in force, but since July 1 it has been on a different footing, and the way it plays out over the next decade matters to your paycheque, your grocery bill and your savings. Most of us missed the moment because nothing visibly changed that day. That is exactly why it deserves a closer look, especially with the federal budget arriving Thursday. The short version: CUSMA did not end. It moved from a long-term deal to a deal that gets reviewed every year until 2036. Roughly 90% of what Canada sells to the U.S. has been crossing the border tariff-free because of it, so each annual review is a chance for that protection to be tested. For households, this is a slow-burn r...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Controversial U.K. Plan to Send Asylum Seekers to Rwanda Sparks Debate


The British parliament recently passed a law that allows for the deportation of asylum seekers arriving on British shores without prior permission to Rwanda. Here are the key points about this contentious program:

  1. Background and Motivation:

    • The U.K. government’s plan was developed in response to a surge in migrant and asylum seeker arrivals via small boats from France.
    • Local asylum programs in the U.K. have been overwhelmed and underfunded, leading to housing asylum seekers in hotels where they remain unable to work until their claims are processed, which can take years.
    • These hotels cost the government nearly £8 million (approximately $10 million) per day to rent.

  2. The Rwanda Plan:

    • The new policy grants Britain’s immigration authorities the power to send any asylum seeker who entered the U.K. “illegally” after January 2022 to Rwanda.
    • Even if their aim is to claim asylum and they have legitimate grounds to do so, individuals arriving without prior permission can be immediately sent to Rwanda, which is approximately 4,000 miles away in East Africa.
    • Under this law, asylum seekers could be granted refugee status in Rwanda and allowed to stay there.

  3. Controversy and Criticism:

    • The program has faced intense controversy and political wrangling.
    • In November 2023, the U.K. Supreme Court ruled the program unlawful, citing violations of the European Convention on Human Rights. The concern was that genuine refugees might be deported back to their home countries, where they could face harm.
    • Human rights groups and the United Nations refugee agency have condemned the plan.

  4. Royal Assent and Ongoing Debate:

    • The bill now awaits King Charles III’s royal ascent to become an official law.
    • The plan has been criticized by various parties, including King Charles III himself, who reportedly called it “appalling” when it was first proposed.

  5. Recent Tragedy:

    • Hours after the law was passed, French officials reported that at least five people, including a child, drowned in the English Channel while attempting to reach the U.K. on an overcrowded small boat.

In summary, the U.K.'s decision to send asylum seekers to Rwanda remains a highly contentious issue, with strong arguments on both sides. While proponents see it as a deterrent to illegal entry, critics raise concerns about human rights and the safety of vulnerable individuals fleeing persecution. The debate continues as the program awaits final approval from the monarchy.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment