Skip to main content

Featured

                                                 The Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) in Greenland Global markets faltered as fresh tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump reignited fears of a renewed trade clash between Washington and key European partners. The announcement targeted several EU nations and immediately sent shockwaves through equities, currencies, and commodities. European stocks opened sharply lower, with export‑heavy sectors—particularly autos, luxury goods, and industrials—bearing the brunt of the selloff. Major multinational firms saw billions wiped from their market value within hours as investors braced for potential retaliatory measures from Brussels. The proposed tariffs, set to begin at 10% and potentially rise to 25% later in the year, stem from escalating geopolitical disagreements that have st...

article

Ex-Prosecutor Identifies Game-Changing Testimony in Trump’s Hush Money Trial


In a dramatic turn of events during the trial related to hush money payments, former U.S. Army prosecutor Glenn Kirschner highlighted a piece of testimony that could haunt Donald Trump. The trial centers around allegations that Trump falsified business documents to conceal payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

On election night in 2016, attorney Keith Davidson, who represented Stormy Daniels at the time, texted then-National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard with a revealing question: “What have we done?” This message came as it became increasingly apparent that Trump would win the election. The Enquirer had also engaged in a “catch and kill” initiative to bury potentially damaging stories about Trump.

Kirschner described this testimony as “breathtaking” and emphasized that it directly undermines one of Trump’s key defense assertions. Davidson’s acknowledgment of his actions potentially impacting the election result suggests that they recognized the damage caused by their conduct. Moreover, it’s clear that the hush money payments were intended to influence the election, not merely to conceal information from Melania or Trump’s family.

This revelation could have far-reaching consequences for Trump’s criminal responsibility. It challenges the defense’s attempts to distance Trump from any wrongdoing. As the trial unfolds, the impact of this admission remains to be seen.


Comments