Skip to main content

Featured

Best High-Interest Savings Accounts in Canada 2026 — Complete Guide

  Published: April 2026 | Reading time: 10 min | Category: Saving Money, Personal Finance, Budgeting If your money is sitting in a big bank savings account earning 0.01% interest, you are losing money to inflation every single month. In 2026, the best high-interest savings accounts in Canada are paying 3.5% to 5% — that's 100 to 500 times more than what the Big Six banks typically offer on their standard savings accounts. Switching takes about 15 minutes. The difference on a $20,000 emergency fund is $700–$1,000 per year in extra interest — for doing absolutely nothing differently except choosing the right bank. This guide covers the best high-interest savings accounts available to Canadians in 2026, ranked by rate, features, and reliability — so you can stop leaving free money on the table. Why Your Big Bank Savings Account Is Costing You Money The Big Six banks — RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC, and National Bank — dominate Canadian banking but consistently offer some o...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Ex-Prosecutor Identifies Game-Changing Testimony in Trump’s Hush Money Trial


In a dramatic turn of events during the trial related to hush money payments, former U.S. Army prosecutor Glenn Kirschner highlighted a piece of testimony that could haunt Donald Trump. The trial centers around allegations that Trump falsified business documents to conceal payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

On election night in 2016, attorney Keith Davidson, who represented Stormy Daniels at the time, texted then-National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard with a revealing question: “What have we done?” This message came as it became increasingly apparent that Trump would win the election. The Enquirer had also engaged in a “catch and kill” initiative to bury potentially damaging stories about Trump.

Kirschner described this testimony as “breathtaking” and emphasized that it directly undermines one of Trump’s key defense assertions. Davidson’s acknowledgment of his actions potentially impacting the election result suggests that they recognized the damage caused by their conduct. Moreover, it’s clear that the hush money payments were intended to influence the election, not merely to conceal information from Melania or Trump’s family.

This revelation could have far-reaching consequences for Trump’s criminal responsibility. It challenges the defense’s attempts to distance Trump from any wrongdoing. As the trial unfolds, the impact of this admission remains to be seen.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment