Skip to main content

Featured

Churchill Falls: A 15% Power Bill Rebate, $10 Billion From Ottawa — What It Means for Your Wallet

  Thursday, August 20, 2026 Last Monday, Prime Minister Mark Carney stood on a pier in St. John's alongside Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Tony Wakeham and Quebec Premier Christine Fréchette to announce what Ottawa is calling the largest clean energy investment in North American history. Buried in the headline numbers — $273 billion in nominal contract value, $10 billion in federal financing, 14,000 megawatts of new hydro capacity — is a much simpler story for ordinary Canadians: who pays what for electricity, for the next 50 years. Here's what actually changed, and what it means for your bills whether you live in St. John's, Montreal, or Ajax, Ontario. The deal it's replacing was historically lopsided To understand why this is a big deal, you need the old one. Under the original 1969 Churchill Falls contract, Quebec locked in the right to buy the vast majority of the plant's power from Newfoundland and Labrador at roughly 0.2 cents per kilowatt-hour — a price th...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Canada Loses Appeal of FIFA Penalty in Olympic Drone Spying Scandal

 


In a significant setback for Canadian soccer, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has dismissed Canada’s appeal against a six-point deduction imposed by FIFA. This penalty stems from a drone-spying scandal during the Olympic women’s soccer tournament in Paris 2024.

The controversy began when New Zealand lodged a complaint, alleging that Canadian staff used drones to spy on their training sessions before their opening match. Following an investigation, FIFA docked Canada six points and imposed one-year bans on head coach Bev Priestman and officials Joseph Lombardi and Jasmine Mander.

Despite winning both of their games, the point deduction leaves Canada with zero points in the standings. The CAS ruling, delivered just hours before Canada’s crucial match against Colombia, means the team faces an uphill battle to advance to the quarterfinals.

The Canadian Olympic Committee and Canada Soccer argued that the penalty was disproportionate and unfairly punished the athletes, who were not involved in the alleged cheating. However, the CAS upheld FIFA’s decision, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the integrity of the sport.

This ruling has significant implications for Canada’s chances in the tournament and underscores the serious consequences of violating fair play principles in international sports.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment