Skip to main content

Featured

Understanding Your TFSA Contribution Room in 2026

A Tax‑Free Savings Account (TFSA) is one of Canada’s most flexible and powerful savings tools, but figuring out your exact contribution room can feel like solving a puzzle. A clear breakdown makes it much easier. How TFSA Contribution Room Works Your available room is made up of three parts: Annual TFSA limit for the current year Unused contribution room from previous years Withdrawals from previous years (added back the following January) For 2026, the annual TFSA limit is $7,000 . Step‑by‑Step: How to Calculate Your Room Use this simple formula: [ \text{TFSA Room} = \text{Unused Room from Prior Years} + \text{Current Year Limit} + \text{Withdrawals from Last Year} ] A quick example: Unused room from past years: $18,000 2026 limit: $7,000 Withdrawals made in 2025: $4,000 [ \text{Total Room} = 18,000 + 7,000 + 4,000 = 29,000 ] That means you could contribute $29,000 in 2026 without penalty. A Few Helpful Notes Over‑contributions lead to penalties, so it’s worth...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity: Key Implications for Donald Trump

 

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on immunity has significant implications for presidential power and accountability. Here are some key facts from the ruling:

  1. Presidential Immunity: The majority ruling states that presidents, including former President Donald Trump, have immunity from criminal prosecution when carrying out “official acts.” However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision is based on the constitutional separation of powers and the nature of presidential authority.

  2. Partisan Split: The ruling fell along partisan lines, with the six conservative justices voting in favor of immunity and the three liberal justices dissenting.

  3. Impact on Trump: In the short term, this ruling almost certainly helps Trump avoid further trials before the 2024 general election. The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to determine which elements of the indictment count as official and unofficial acts. Trump can use this opinion as a defense.

  4. Campaign Trail: Given the ongoing presidential campaign, this issue is likely to be a topic of discussion. Both political parties have raised concerns about perceived abuses of presidential power.

  5. Public Perception: By stating that presidents are not immune from prosecution for personal acts, the court emphasizes that the highest office in the land is subject to the same legal standards as everyone else.

In summary, the ruling creates a balance between immunity for official acts and accountability for personal conduct, impacting Trump’s pending criminal cases and shaping the public’s view of presidential power. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment