Skip to main content

Featured

Canadians Are Feeling Less Squeezed — But Fraud Is Rewriting How We Manage Credit

  New data from TransUnion's Q2 2026 Canada Consumer Pulse Study, released July 22, 2026 There's a small but real shift happening in Canadian households right now. After years of headlines about affordability and inflation, a new survey suggests things are slightly less bleak — but Canadians aren't relaxing. They're getting more careful, and increasingly, more worried about fraud than about their credit score. TransUnion's newest Consumer Pulse Study, out today, paints a picture of a country cautiously exhaling — while quietly tightening the locks on its financial front door. The Good News: A Little More Breathing Room For the first time in a while, the numbers aren't all doom. Roughly a quarter of Canadians surveyed said their household income rose over the past three months, and nearly one in four say their finances are running better than they expected this year — the best reading TransUnion has recorded in the past 12 months. Optimism is edging up too: 45% ...

article

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity: Key Implications for Donald Trump

 

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on immunity has significant implications for presidential power and accountability. Here are some key facts from the ruling:

  1. Presidential Immunity: The majority ruling states that presidents, including former President Donald Trump, have immunity from criminal prosecution when carrying out “official acts.” However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision is based on the constitutional separation of powers and the nature of presidential authority.

  2. Partisan Split: The ruling fell along partisan lines, with the six conservative justices voting in favor of immunity and the three liberal justices dissenting.

  3. Impact on Trump: In the short term, this ruling almost certainly helps Trump avoid further trials before the 2024 general election. The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to determine which elements of the indictment count as official and unofficial acts. Trump can use this opinion as a defense.

  4. Campaign Trail: Given the ongoing presidential campaign, this issue is likely to be a topic of discussion. Both political parties have raised concerns about perceived abuses of presidential power.

  5. Public Perception: By stating that presidents are not immune from prosecution for personal acts, the court emphasizes that the highest office in the land is subject to the same legal standards as everyone else.

In summary, the ruling creates a balance between immunity for official acts and accountability for personal conduct, impacting Trump’s pending criminal cases and shaping the public’s view of presidential power. 

Comments